Skip to main content

Book Review: Imprudence



Happy Thursday, everyone. September is almost here!

August's book review for general consumption, is here, and I am happy to say that it is Imprudence, by Gail Carriger. Since it is the second novel in The Custard Protocol series, a SPOILER WARNING is now in effect for the entirety of the Parasol Protectorate Universe. If you haven't read the rest of it, you might want to stay clear of this review until you've caught up with all of the novel series.

If you are still working your way through the Finishing School series, though, maybe my reviews of Waistcoats & Weaponry  (book three) and Manners & Mutiny (book four) from last year will help?

Wow, that was a mouthful. On to the review, then.

Imprudence (The Custard Protocol #2)
Gail Carriger, 2017, Orbit Books

Summary:
Prudence (Rue) and the crew of the Spotted Custard are riding high after their adventures in India, but their return to London quickly brings them back down.

Opinion:
My feelings about this one are mixed. Imprudence paid off some major strings left untied from the end of The Parasol Protectorate series in regards to Biffy, and Alexia and Conall (Rue's biological parents), and I was giddy with excitement to see that. I'm as much a fan as ever of the words that Gail Carriger puts into a story. Those things more than anything else are what kept me reading to the end of this one.

However, Rue as a point of view character is starting to wear on me. The options for her development as a character seemed much more limited than in Prudence, seeing as so much of the story this time around revolved first around getting Rue's parents to their destination in one piece, then around the consequences of the ongoing intellectual feud between Percy and Quesnel. It was more about other people and other things than her, so there wasn't enough room for her to grow as much as I would have liked to see happen.

From what I understand, Competence (#3 in the series) is from Primrose's point of view. Hopefully, that alleviates some of the weariness.

There were two important developments for Rue in this book. The first seemed to be the movement of her romance with Quesnel from flirting and sexual tension into a physical relationship that may or may not be love (the intent may be to keep them together, but I'm not convinced of their staying power going into the next book). The second was Alexia officially initiating Rue - along with Prim - into the Parasol Protectorate. While Alexia doing this was the reigns was a lovely moment (and an important development for the series), something about it just felt weird and not quite right. It needed to happen, but I can't quite put my finger on what felt off about it.

Also, I suppose the Queen's withdrawal of  protection for Rue from the supernatural world, her parents' departures from their respective posts (Lord Maccon from BUR and Alexia from the council for supernaturals), and Rue coming of age was all intended to impress a sense of danger on the group in their travels, but other concerns in the story overwhelmed it. I'm hoping those concerns get paid off in later parts of the series.

Conclusion:
No writer is perfect. Not even your favorite.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metaphors: Candles

I've recently fallen in love with candles. Since coming home from the World Race , I've bought at least one a month. My favorite candles are the ones that come in glass jars - because when they burn out, I can clean the remaining wax out and put the jars to other uses. Right now,  that means they get cleaned out and packed away in anticipation of my move to Flagstaff. But as I was lighting one tonight (vanilla spice... Thanksgiving smells? Yes, please!), I saw a metaphor for writing flickering away in the flame licking at the wick and melting the wax. I suppose it could be a metaphor for life in general, but since the theme of this blog is writing... Well, you do the math.

[Five Minute Friday] Purpose

Fiber bars, strewn along the side of the road. There had to be at least a dozen of them, still in their wrappers and completely unopened. No box in sight. Really? That's about the reaction my younger sister and I had when we stumbled on them on our early morning run. Really? along with disgusted sighs about the wastefulness of it. These were the expensive ones, not a generic store brand that kind of tastes and kind of looks the same sometimes. So, when we weren't keeping an eye out for their box, we speculated about what had happened. And wondered how many more we were going to see before the end of our run. "Maybe they took one bite and thought they were gross," my sister said. "So they threw them out because they didn't want them anymore." I let out one of those disgusted sighs and nodded along with her theory. "Yeah, or they got in a huge fight, and threw them out in a fit of rage." "That's a possibility." And

How to Make Sure Your Book Review Request Does NOT Get Deleted

I've been hesitant to write this post. That is due, in large part, to how angry I get some days after reading book review requests. I curse, I rant, I snark. My cat will tell you it's not a pretty sight. But I also feel like this is a good opportunity to talk about what it is that makes me feel those feelings AND how to not stir them up. I'm not the only reviewer that gets frustrated when I see certain things in my emails from authors looking for a review. And I know I'm not the only one who gets triggered enough to ignore or delete those messages. I never feel good about doing it. It's just that I'm hitting the proverbial wall here and I want to hit it a little less often. So if you're an author looking for loving advice on how to approach reviewers (especially this one), read on. Review Requests I Always  Delete Before I get into what to do, I wanted to take a minute to look at what not to do (and how I handle it). Want to know what immedi